4.8 Article

Nanosized MoSe2@Carbon Matrix: A Stable Host Material for the Highly Reversible Storage of Potassium and Aluminum Ions

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 47, Pages 44333-44341

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b16155

Keywords

MoSe2; potassium-ion batteries; aluminum-ion batteries; DFT calculations; wide operation temperature

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804173]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018BB030]
  3. Qingdao Science and Technology Plan Applied Basic Research (Youth Special Project) [18-2-2-22-jch]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owing to their low cost and abundant reserves relative to conventional lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), potassium-ion batteries (PIBs), and aluminum-ion batteries (AIBs) have shown appealing potential for electrochemical energy storage, but progress so far has been limited by the lack of suitable electrode materials. In this work, we demonstrated a facile strategy to achieve highly reversible potassium and aluminum ions storage in strongly coupled nanosized MoSe2@carbon matrix, induced through an ion complexation strategy. We present a broad range of electrochemical characterization of the synthesized product that exhibits high specific capacities, good rate capability, and excellent cycling stability toward PIBs and AIBs. Through a series of systematic ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterizations and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the Al3+ intercalation mechanism of MoSe2-based AIBs are elucidated. Moreover, both the assembled PIBs and AIBs worked well when exposed to low and high temperatures within the range of -10 to 50 degrees C, showing promise for energy storage devices in harsh environment. The present study provides new insights into the exploration of MoSe2 as high-performance electrode materials for PIBs and AIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available