4.8 Article

Green Production of Regenerated Cellulose/Boron Nitride Nanosheet Textiles for Static and Dynamic Personal Cooling

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 43, Pages 40685-40693

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b15612

Keywords

regenerated cellulose; boron nitride nanosheets; personal cooling; thermal conductivity; hygroscopicity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573102, 51421061]
  2. Nanjing University of Science and Technology [AE89991/222]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Personal cooling technology using functional clothing that could provide localized thermal regulation instead of cooling the entire space is regarded as a highly anticipated strategy to not only facilitate thermal comfort and human health but also be energy-saving and low-cost. The challenge is how to endow textiles with prominent cooling effect whenever the wearer is motionless or sportive. In this study, high content of edge-selective hydroxylated boron nitride nanosheets (BNNSs) up to 60 wt % was added into a biodegradable cellulose/alkaline/urea aqueous solution, and then regenerated cellulose (RCF)/BNNS multifilaments were successfully spun in a simple, low-cost, and environmentally friendly process, which was demonstrated to serve as both static and dynamic personal cooling textile. Typically, excellent axial thermal conductivity of RCF/BNNS filament rendered that body-generated heat could directly escape from skin to the outside surface of the textile by means of thermal conduction, achieving a much better static personal cooling result through continuous thermal radiation. Besides, synergistic effect between excellent heat dissipation capability and good hygroscopicity also resulted in much better dynamic cooling effect once the wearer is doing some sports, whose efficiency was even better than commercial hygroscopic textiles such as cotton and RCF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available