4.6 Article

Detection and Quantification of GPCR mRNA: An Assessment and Implications of Data from High-Content Methods

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 4, Issue 16, Pages 17048-17059

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02811

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA121938, HL007444, CA189477, AG053568]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-14-1-0372]
  3. Bristol Myers Squibb
  4. ASPET David Lehr Award
  5. Padres Pedal the Cause [PTC2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane receptors and targets for approved drugs. The analysis of GPCR expression is, thus, important for drug discovery and typically involves messenger RN (mRNA)-based methods. We compared transcriptomic complementary DNA(cDNA) (Affymetrix) microarrays, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based TaqMan arrays for their ability to detect and quantify expression of endoGPCRs (nonchemosensory GPCRs with endogenous agonists). In human pancreatic cancer-associated fibroblasts, RNA-seq and TaqMan arrays yielded closely correlated values for GPCR number (similar to 100) and expression levels, as validated by independent qPCR. By contrast, the microarrays failed to identify similar to 30 such GPCRs and generated data poorly correlated with results from those methods. RNA-seq and TaqMan arrays also yielded comparable results for GPCRs in human cardiac fibroblasts, pancreatic stellate cells, cancer cell lines, and pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells. The magnitude of mRNA expression for several Gq/11-coupled GPCRs predicted cytosolic calcium increase and cell migration by cognate agonists. RNA-seq also revealed splice variants for endoGPCRs. Thus, RNA-seq and qPCR-based arrays are much better suited than transcriptomic cDNA microarrays for assessing GPCR expression and can yield results predictive of functional responses, findings that have implications for GPCR biology and drug discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available