4.6 Article

Designing SnO2 Nanostructure-Based Sensors with Tailored Selectivity toward Propanol and Ethanol Vapors

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages 13696-13709

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01079

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research [HGER74P]
  2. Department of Science and Technology [HGERA8X]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of metal oxide-based sensors for the detection of volatile organic compounds is restricted because of their high operating temperatures and poor gas sensing selectivity. Driven by this fact, we report the low operating temperature and high performance of C3H7OH and C2H5OH sensors. The sensors comprising SnO2 hollow spheres, nanoparticles, nanorods, and fishbones with tunable morphologies were synthesized with a simple hydrothermal one-pot method. The SnO2 hollow spheres demonstrated the highest sensing response (resistance ratio of 20) toward C3H7OH at low operating temperatures (75 degrees C) compared to other tested interference vapors and gases, such as C3H5O, C2H5OH, CO, NH3, CH4, and NO2. This improved response can be associated with the higher surface area and intrinsic point defects. At a higher operating temperature of 150 degrees C, a response of 28 was witnessed for SnO2 nanorods. A response of 59 was observed for SnO2 nanoparticle-based sensor toward C2H5OH at 150 degrees C. This variation in the optimal temperature with respect to variations in the sensor morphology implies that the vapor selectivity and sensitivity are morphology-dependent. The relation between the intrinsic sensing performance and vapor selectivity originated from the nonstoichiometry of SnO2, which resulted in excess oxygen vacancies (V-O) and higher surface areas. This characteristic played a vital role in the enhancement of the target gas absorptivity and the charge transfer capability of SnO2 hollow sphere-based sensor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available