4.6 Review

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for diabetic kidney disease: a primer for deprescribing

Journal

CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 620-628

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz100

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; deprescribing; diabetic kidney disease; polypharmacy; sodium-glucose cotransporter 2

Funding

  1. Ben J. Lipps Research Fellowship from the American Society of Nephrology
  2. National Institutes of Health NIDDK K23 grant [1K23DK100447]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical global public health problem associated with high morbidity and mortality, poorer quality of life and increased health care expenditures. CKD and its associated comorbidities are one of the most complex clinical constellations to manage. Treatments for CKD and its comorbidities lead to polypharmacy, which exponentiates the morbidity and mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown remarkable benefits in cardiovascular and renal protection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The pleiotropic effects of SGLT2is beyond glycosuria suggest a promising role in reducing polypharmacy in diabetic CKD, but the potential adverse effects of SGLT2is should also be considered. In this review, we present a typical case of a patient with multiple comorbidities seen in a CKD clinic, highlighting the polypharmacy and complexity in the management of proteinuria, hyperkalemia, volume overload, hyperuricemia, hypoglycemia and obesity. We review the cardiovascular and renal protection effects of SGLT2is in the context of clinical trials and current guidelines. We then discuss the roles of SGLT2is in the management of associated comorbidities and review the adverse effects and controversies of SGLT2is. We conclude with a proposal for deprescribing principles when initiating SGLT2is in patients with diabetic CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available