4.4 Article

Sitagliptin for the prevention of stress hyperglycemia in patients without diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery

Journal

BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000703

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/NATS from the Clinical and Translational Science Award program [UL1 TR002378]
  2. NIH [1P30DK111024-01, 1K23GM128221-01A1, 3K12HD085850-03S1]
  3. National Center for Research Resources [1P30DK111024-01]
  4. Merck
  5. Novo Nordisk
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim
  8. Sanofi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To determine if treatment with sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, can prevent stress hyperglycemia in patients without diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Methods We conducted a pilot, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial in adults (18-80 years) without history of diabetes. Participants received sitagliptin or placebo once daily, starting the day prior to surgery and continued for up to 10 days. Primary outcome was differences in the frequency of stress hyperglycemia (blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL) after surgery among groups. Results We randomized 32 participants to receive sitagliptin and 28 to placebo (mean age 64 +/- 10 years and HbA1c: 5.6%+/- 0.5%). Treatment with sitagliptin resulted in lower BG levels prior to surgery (101 +/- mg/dL vs 107 +/- 13 mg/dL, p=0.01); however, there were no differences in the mean BG concentration, proportion of patients who developed stress hyperglycemia (21% vs 22%, p>0.99), length of hospital stay, rate of perioperative complications and need for insulin therapy in the intensive care unit or during the hospital stay. Conclusion The use of sitagliptin during the perioperative period did not prevent the development of stress hyperglycemia or need for insulin therapy in patients without diabetes undergoing CABG surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available