4.5 Article

CO2 gasification of biogenic fuels in a dual fluidized bed reactor system

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 1101-1116

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-019-00493-3

Keywords

CO2 gasification; Biomass; Biogenic residue; 100 kW(th) pilot plant; CO2 conversion; Hydrogen balance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that the treatment of different biogenic fuels in a dual fluidized bed gasification process can affect the composition of the product gas, with alkali metals in biomass ash favoring CO production, and the addition of limestone increasing H2 and CO contents.
A 100 kW(th) dual fluidized bed steam gasification pilot plant has been developed at TU Wien to convert different types of biogenic fuels into a valuable product gas. In this paper, the conversion of different biogenic fuels in combination with the utilization of CO2 as alternative gasification agent was investigated in the mentioned pilot plant. For this purpose, five experimental campaigns were carried out aiming at the investigation of softwood as reference fuel, and rapeseed cake, bark and lignin as alternative fuels. Pure olivine as well as a mixture (90/10 wt%) of olivine and limestone were used as bed materials. The product gas compositions of the different biogenic fuels changed depending on the elemental composition of the biogenic fuels. Thus, a high amount of carbon in the fuel enhanced CO formation, whereas an increased content of oxygen led to higher CO2 contents. Additionally, the presence of alkali metals in the biomass ash favoured the production of CO. The addition of limestone enhanced the H-2 and CO contents via the water gas shift reaction as well as steam and dry reforming reactions, but had no significant effect on tar contents. Overall, this paper presents the feasibility of the dual-fluidized bed gasification process of different biogenic fuels with CO2 as gasification agent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available