4.6 Article

Impact of Cholesterol on Ischemic Stroke in Different Human-Like Hamster Models: A New Animal Model for Ischemic Stroke Study

Journal

CELLS
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells8091028

Keywords

LDLR; ABCA1; gold syrian hamster; ischemic stroke

Categories

Funding

  1. NSFC [81860224, 31520103909, 81270367, 81570787, 81770449]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFE0126000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: While high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are positively associated with cardiovascular events, it is still unclear whether familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and Tangier's disease (TD), caused by mutations in LDLR and ABCA1, respectively, influence ischemic stroke (IS) in humans. Objective: We sought to establish an easier, more effective, and time-saving method to induce IS, then studied the precise effects of different types of lipoproteins on IS. Methods and Results: A new technique termed contralateral middle cerebral artery occlusion (c-MCAO) was introduced to human-like hamster models to induce IS. Compared to traditional distal MCAO (d-MCAO) induced by electrocoagulation, c-MCAO resulted in a more severe IS with larger infarct sizes and more blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption after 24 h. It was shown that c-MCAO markedly elicited an increase in brain infarct volume and BBB leakage in both homozygous LDLR (LDLR-/-) and ABCA1 knockout (ABCA1(-/-)) hamsters, but not in heterozygous LDLR knockout (LDLR+/-) hamsters when compared to wild-type (WT) controls. Conclusions: Using human-like genetically engineered hamsters, our findings demonstrated that both high LDL-C level caused by homozygous LDLR deficiency and severe low HDL-C level caused by deleting ABCA1 were risk factors of IS. As such, we believe the development of this novel IS hamster model is suitable for future ischemic/reperfusion studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available