4.6 Review

The Tumor Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer Therapy

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11081172

Keywords

colorectal cancer; mCRC; tumor microenvironment (TME); tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs); angiogenesis; tumor metabolism

Categories

Funding

  1. MINECO European Commission FEDER funds, Una manera de hacer Europa [SAF2015-66984-C2-1-R]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI13/01728, PI19/00740]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III and Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas [CIBEREHD CB17/04/00023]
  4. Agencia de Gestio de Ajuts de Recerca (AGAUR) [2017 SGR 1174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current standard-of-care for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) includes chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, even though the addition of anti-angiogenic agents to backbone chemotherapy provides little benefit for overall survival. Since the approval of anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibodies bevacizumab and aflibercept, for the management of mCRC over a decade ago, extensive efforts have been devoted to discovering predictive factors of the anti-angiogenic response, unsuccessfully. Recent evidence has suggested a potential correlation between angiogenesis and immune phenotypes associated with colorectal cancer. Here, we review evidence of interactions between tumor angiogenesis, the immune microenvironment, and metabolic reprogramming. More specifically, we will highlight such interactions as inferred from our novel immune-metabolic (IM) signature, which groups mCRC into three distinct clusters, namely inflamed-stromal-dependent (IM Cluster 1), inflamed-non stromal-dependent (IM Cluster 2), and non-inflamed or cold (IM Cluster 3), and discuss the merits of the IM classification as a guide to new immune-metabolic combinatorial therapeutic strategies in mCRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available