4.7 Article

Metabolic Fingerprint of Acromegaly and Its Potential Usefulness in Clinical Practice

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101549

Keywords

acromegaly; metabolomics; amino acids; branched chain; insulin resistance; muscular weakness

Funding

  1. Pfizer Global Investigator Initiated Research
  2. Junta de Andalucia [CTS-1406, BIO-0139]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [BFU2016-80360-R]
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  5. European Union (ERDF/ESF) [PI16/00264, CP15/00156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) levels are the main targets for monitoring acromegaly activity, but they are not in close relationship with the clinical course of the disease and the associated comorbidities. The present study was aimed at identifying metabolites that could be used as biomarkers for a better disease phenotyping. For this purpose, metabolic fingerprint using an untargeted metabolomic approach was examined in serum from 30 patients with acromegaly and 30 age-matched controls. Patients with acromegaly presented fewer branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) compared to the control group (valine: 4.75 +/- 0.87 vs. 5.20 +/- 1.06 arbitrary units (AUs), p < 0.05; isoleucine: 2.54 +/- 0.41 vs. 2.80 +/- 0.51 AUs; p < 0.05). BCAAs were also lower in patients with active disease compared to patients with normal levels of IGF-1 with or without medical treatment. GH, but not IGF-1, serum levels were inversely correlated with both valine and isoleucine. These findings indicate that low levels of BCAAs represent the main metabolic fingerprint of acromegaly and that GH, rather than IGF-1, might be the primary mediator. In addition, our results suggest that the assessment of BCAAs could help to identify active disease and to monitor the response to therapeutic strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available