4.6 Article

Formulation and Characterization of Edible Films Based on Organic Mucilage from Mexican Opuntia ficus-indica

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings9080506

Keywords

organic; mucilage; edible films; characterization

Funding

  1. Sectorial fund for research, development and forest technological innovation CONAFOR-CONACYT [B-S-65769]
  2. Estandarizacion del proceso de extraccion de aceites esenciales de especiaes aromaticas: diseno y constriccion de equipo microindistrial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The consumption of organic products has increased in recent years. One of the most important products in Mexico is nopal. Nopal's content and properties make the formulation of edible films possible. In this study, we aimed to develop and characterize biodegradable edible films containing mucilage from Opuntia ficus-indica. The mucilage extraction yield, thickness, color, water vapor permeability, light transmission rate, film transparency, solubility, stability of dispersion, and puncture strength were measured. The use of mucilage from different cultivars affected the water vapor permeability (8.40 x 10(-11) g center dot m(-1)center dot s(-1)center dot Pa-1 for cultivar Villanueva, 3.48 x 10(-11) g center dot m(-1)center dot s(-1)center dot Pa-1 for Jalpa, and 1.63 x 10(-11) g center dot m(-1)center dot s(-1)center dot Pa-1 for Copena F1). Jalpa provided the most soluble mucilage with the highest thickness (0.105 mm). Copena F1 provided the clearest film with the greatest transparency (3.81), the best yellowness index, and the highest resistance (4.44 N center dot mm(-1)). Furthermore, this film had the best light transmission rate (48.93%). The Copena F1 showed the best film formation solution viscosity. These results indicate that mucilage mixed with pectin is a potential source for the formulation of edible films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available