4.5 Article

Modeling electron transfer in photosystem I

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
Volume 1857, Issue 6, Pages 723-733

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.03.015

Keywords

Photosystem I; Electron transfer; A(1); Phylloquinone; Energetics; Kinetic modeling

Funding

  1. Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation) [NPRP 4-183-1-034]
  2. Molecular Basis of Disease program at Georgia State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanosecond to millisecond time-resolved absorption spectroscopy has been used to study electron transfer processes in photosystem I particles from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 with eight different quinones incorporated into the A(1) binding site, at both 298 and 77 K. A detailed kinetic model was constructed and solved within the context of Marcus electron transfer theory, and it was found that all of the data could be well described only if the in situ midpoint potentials of the quinones fell in a tightly defined range. For photosystem I with phylloquinone incorporated into the A(1) binding site all of the time-resolved optical data is best modeled when the in situ midpoint potential of phylloquinone on the A/B branch is -635/-690 mV, respectively. With the midpoint potential of the F-x iron sulfur cluster set at 680 my, this indicates that forward electron transfer from A ((1)) over bar to Fx is slightly endergonic/exergonic on the A/B branch, respectively. Additionally, for forward electron transfer from A ((1)) over bar to Fx, on both the A and B branches the reorganization energy is close to 0.7 eV. Reorganization energies of 0.4 or 1.0 eV are not possible. For the eight different quinones incorporated, the same kinetic model was used, allowing us to establish in situ redox potentials for all of the incorporated quinones on both branches. A linear correlation was found between the in situ and in vitro midpoint potentials of the quinones on both branches. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available