4.7 Article

Forecasting the Rates of Future Aftershocks of All Generations Is Essential to Develop Better Earthquake Forecast Models

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 124, Issue 8, Pages 8404-8425

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016668

Keywords

earthquake forecasting; ETAS model; model testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, one of the best performing earthquake forecasting models relies on the working hypothesis that the locations of past background earthquakes reveal the probable location of future seismicity. As an alternative, we present a class of smoothed seismicity models (SSMs) based on the principles of the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model, which forecast the location, time, and magnitude of all future earthquakes using the estimates of the background seismicity rate and the rates of future aftershocks of all generations. Using the Californian earthquake catalog, we formulate six controlled pseudo-prospective experiments with different combinations of three target magnitude thresholds: 2.95, 3.95, or 4.95 and two forecasting time horizons: 1 or 5 years. In these experiments, we compare the performance of (1) the ETAS model with spatially homogenous parameters, or GETAS; (2) the ETAS model with spatially variable parameters, or SVETAS; (3) three declustering-based SSMs; (4) a simple SSM based on undeclustered data, and (5) a model based on strain rate data, in forecasting the location and magnitude of all (undeclustered) target earthquakes during many testing periods. In all conducted experiments, the SVETAS model comes out with consistent superiority compared to all the competing models. Consistently better performance of the SVETAS model with respect to declustering-based SSMs highlights the importance of forecasting the future aftershocks of all generations for developing better earthquake forecasting models. Among the two ETAS models themselves, accounting for the optimal spatial variation of the parameters leads to stronger improvements in forecasting performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available