4.5 Article

Large Effects of Particle Size Heterogeneity on Dynamic Saltation Threshold

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE
Volume 124, Issue 8, Pages 2311-2321

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JF005094

Keywords

saltation threshold; dynamic threshold; aeolian sand transport; saltation; wind-blown sand; planetary sediment transport

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11750410687, 11772143, 11672267]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017XZZX001-02A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reliably predicting the geomorphology and climate of planetary bodies requires knowledge of the dynamic threshold wind shear velocity below which saltation transport ceases. Here we measure this threshold in a wind tunnel for four well-sorted and two poorly sorted sand beds by visual means and by a method that exploits a regime shift in the behavior of the surface roughness caused by momentum transfer from the wind to the saltating particles. For our poorly sorted sands, we find that these measurement methods yield different threshold values because, at the smaller visual threshold, relatively coarse particles do not participate in saltation. We further find that both methods yield threshold values that are much larger (60-250%) for our poorly sorted sands than for our well-sorted sands with similar median particle diameter. In particular, even a rescaling of the dynamic saltation threshold based on the 90th percentile particle diameter rather than the median diameter cannot fully capture this difference, suggesting that relatively very coarse particles have a considerable control on the dynamic threshold. Similar findings were previously reported for water-driven sediment transport. Our findings have important implications for quantitative predictions of saltation transport-related geophysical processes, such as dust aerosol emission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available