4.7 Article

FAIR adoption, assessment and challenges at UniProt

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0180-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute (NEI) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [U24HG007822]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [U24HG007822]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [U24HG007822]
  4. National Institute on Aging (NIA) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [U24HG007822]
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [U24HG007822]
  6. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [U24HG007822]
  7. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [U24HG007822]
  8. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) [U24HG007822]
  9. European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
  10. Alzheimer's Research UK [ARUK-NAS2017A-1]
  11. British Heart Foundation (BHF) [RG/13/5/30112]
  12. Parkinson's Disease United Kingdom (PDUK) GO grant [G-1307]
  13. NIH GO grant [U41HG02273]
  14. Swiss Federal Government through the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI
  15. NIH [R01GM080646, G08LM010720, P20GM103446]
  16. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DBI-1062520]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UniProt continues to support the ongoing process of making scientific data FAIR. Here we contribute to this process with a FAIRness assessment of our UniProtKB dataset followed by a critical reflection on the challenges and future directions of the adoption and validation of the FAIR principles and metrics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available