4.1 Article

Enhancing Student Retention of Prerequisite Knowledge Through Pre-Class Activities and In-Class Reinforcement

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EDUCATION
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 97-104

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20992

Keywords

Effective in-class problems; learning and curriculum design; sources of difficulties and teaching strategies to correct difficulties; teaching and learning techniques methods and approaches; pre-requisite knowledge

Funding

  1. Study of Biochemistry at Wabash College
  2. National Science Foundation's Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science [1140711]
  3. Division Of Undergraduate Education
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1140711] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To foster the connection between biochemistry and the supporting prerequisite concepts, a collection of activities that explicitly link general and organic chemistry concepts to biochemistry ideas was written and either assigned as pre-class work or as recitation activities. We assessed student learning gains after using these activities alone, or in combination with regularly-integrated clicker and discussion questions. Learning gains were determined from student performance on pre-and post-tests covering key prerequisite concepts, biochemistry course exams, and stu-dent self-evaluation. Long-term retention of the material was assessed using a comprehensive exam given to a subset of the students. Our results show that using the preclass exercises in combination with integrative questions was effective at improving student performance in both the short and long term. Similar results were obtained at both a large research institution with large class enrollments and at a private liberal arts college with moderate enrollments. (C) 2016 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 45(2): 97-104, 2017.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available