4.6 Article

History of Migraine and Volume of Brain Infarcts: The Italian Project on Stroke at Young Age (IPSYS)

Journal

JOURNAL OF STROKE
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 324-+

Publisher

KOREAN STROKE SOC
DOI: 10.5853/jos.2019.00332

Keywords

Brain ischemia; Cortical spreading depression; Migraine disorders; Risk factors; Stroke

Funding

  1. Associazione per la Lotta alla Trombosi e alle Malattie Cardiovascolari (ALT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose Migraine has been shown to increase cerebral excitability, promote rapid infarct expansion into tissue with perfusion deficits, and result in larger infarcts in animal models of focal cerebral ischemia. Whether these effects occur in humans has never been properly investigated. Methods In a series of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke, enrolled in the setting of the Italian Project on Stroke at Young Age, we assessed acute as well as chronic infarct volumes by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging, and compared these among different subgroups identified by migraine status. Results A cohort of 591 patients (male, 53.8%; mean age, 37.5 +/- 6.4 years) qualified for the analysis. Migraineurs had larger acute infarcts than non-migraineurs (median, 5.9 cm(3) [interquartile range (IQR), 1.4 to 15.5] vs. 2.6 cm(3) [IQR, 0.8 to 10.1], P<0.001), and the largest volumes were observed in patients with migraine with aura (median, 9.0 cm(3) [IQR, 3.4 to 16.6]). In a linear regression model, migraine was an independent predictor of increased log (acute infarct volumes) (median ratio [MR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 2.20), an effect that was more prominent for migraine with aura (MR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.88 to 4.54). Conclusions These findings reinforce the experimental observation of larger acute cerebral infarcts in migraineurs, extend animal data to human disease, and support the hypothesis of increased vulnerability to ischemic brain injury in people suffering migraine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available