4.6 Article

A Stratigraphic Prediction Method Based on Machine Learning

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app9173553

Keywords

recurrent neural network; series simulation; three-dimensional geological modeling; expert-driven learning

Funding

  1. Provincial Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2016B010124007]
  2. Science and Technology Youth Top-Notch Talent Project of Guangdong Special Support Program [2015 TQ01Z344]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201803030005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulation of a geostratigraphic unit is of vital importance for the study of geoinformatics, as well as geoengineering planning and design. A traditional method depends on the guidance of expert experience, which is subjective and limited, thereby making the effective evaluation of a stratum simulation quite impossible. To solve this problem, this study proposes a machine learning method for a geostratigraphic series simulation. On the basis of a recurrent neural network, a sequence model of the stratum type and a sequence model of the stratum thickness is successively established. The performance of the model is improved in combination with expert-driven learning. Finally, a machine learning model is established for a geostratigraphic series simulation, and a three-dimensional (3D) geological modeling evaluation method is proposed which considers the stratum type and thickness. The results show that we can use machine learning in the simulation of a series. The series model based on machine learning can describe the real situation at wells, and it is a complimentary tool to the traditional 3D geological model. The prediction ability of the model is improved to a certain extent by including expert-driven learning. This study provides a novel approach for the simulation and prediction of a series by 3D geological modeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available