4.6 Article

Induced 2C Expression and Implantation-Competent Blastocyst-like Cysts from Primed Pluripotent Stem Cells

Journal

STEM CELL REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 485-498

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.07.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. RIKEN
  2. Kyoto University
  3. Gladstone Institutes
  4. L. K. Whittier Foundation
  5. Roddenberry Foundation
  6. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH [U01-HL100406, U01-HL098179]
  7. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)
  8. National Center for Research Resources [RR18928-01]
  9. RIKEN SPDR program
  10. JSPS KAKENHI [17K07246]
  11. Suzuki Memorial Foundation
  12. OMC Internal Research Grant
  13. Yamanaka lab
  14. Takahashi lab
  15. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K07246] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soon after fertilization, the few totipotent cells of mammalian embryos diverge to form a structure called the blastocyst (BC). Although numerous cell types, including germ cells and extended-pluripotency stem cells, have been developed from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) in vitro, generating functional BCs only from PSCs remains elusive. Here, we describe induced self-organizing 3D BC-like cysts (iBLCs) generated from mouse PSC culture. Resembling natural BCs, iBLCs have a blastocoel-like cavity and were formed with outer cells expressing trophectoderm lineage markers and with inner cells expressing pluripotency markers. iBLCs transplanted to pseudopregnant mice uteruses implanted, induced decidualization, and exhibited growth and development before resorption, demonstrating that iBLCs are implantation competent. iBLC precursor intermediates required the transcription factor Prdm14 and concomitantly activated the totipotency-related cleavage-stage MERVL reporter and 2C genes. Thus, our system may contribute to the understanding of molecular mechanisms underpinning totipotency, embryogenesis, and implantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available