4.3 Article

A randomised, multicentre open-label phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin in Chinese patients with chemotherapy-naive unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 3347-3359

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.08.22

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); oral vinorelbine (oral VRL); intravenous vinorelbine (intravenous VRL); cisplatin (CDDP); Chinese patients

Funding

  1. Pierre Fabre Medicament, France
  2. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [81602011]
  3. Outstanding Young Talents Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center [16zxyc03]
  4. Central Basic Scientific Research Fund for Colleges-Young Teacher Training Program of Sun Yatsen University [17ykpy85]
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA12020101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of oral or intravenous vinorelbine (VRL) plus cisplatin (CDDP) in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: One hundred and thirty-one patients were randomised to oral VRL 60 mg/m(2) (arm A) or intravenous VRL 25 mg/m(2) (arm B) on days 1 and 8, plus CDDP 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 (both arms). VRL was increased to 80 mg/m(2) (arm A) or 30 mg/m(2) (arm B) in cycles 2-4 in the absence of toxicity. Primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). VRL pharmacokinetics was evaluated for passible drug-drug interactions with CDDP. Results: ORR was 25.8% in arm A and 23.1% in arm B. Disease control rate was 72.7% in arm A, 72.3% in arm B. Median overall survival was 16.1 months in arm A and 19.0 months in arm B. Median progression free survival was 4.6 months in arm A and 4.9 months in arm B. Forty-three point nine percent and 86.2% of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia in arms A and B, respectively; incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (6.1% and 9.2%, respectively). Frequency of grade 3/4 non-haematological adverse events was also low. VRL pharmacokinetics was not affected by co-administration of CDDP. Conclusions: Oral and intravenous VRL in combination with CDDP is effective and well-tolerated in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC. VRL pharmacokinetics is unaffected by CDDP co-administration. Oral VRL could be an effective alternative to intravenous VRL as a first-line treatment for NSCLC, as it optimises treatment convenience while maintaining high efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available