4.3 Article

Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of swamp eel Monopterus albus in China

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 81-87

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2016.06.006

Keywords

Monopterus albus; Swamp eel; Genetic diversity; Mitochondrial D-loop

Funding

  1. Special Scientific Research Funds for Central Non-profit Institutes, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences in China [2014A11JC05]
  2. Special Funds for National Science and technology Basic Work [2013FY110700]
  3. National Infrastructure of Fishery Germplasm Resources of China [2015DKA30470]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Swamp eel has become one of the most economically important fish in China. However, the wild swamp eel is facing the serious challenge of declining population and germplasm degeneration because most of farming swamp eel fingerlings was collected by fishing wild individuals. In this study, the genetic variation of Monopterus albus in six dominant farming regions was investigated based on the mitochondrial DNA D-Loop of 1008 bp in length. 180 individuals from 6 populations were examined and 74 haplotypes were observed. The overall genetic diversity was abundant and which its SD population was highest but CQ population was lowest. There was obvious genetic differentiation among investigated populations. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these individuals were divided into four distinct genetic clades, Glade A, B, C, and D. Clade A should be the most common ancestor Glade. AH and CQ populations might originate from one single ancestor in maternal Glade A. Clade C should be a native important Glade in China. Though the genetic diversity did not suffered obvious decreasing, it is still imperative to take effective conservation measurements and establish an efficient selective breeding program. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available