4.6 Article

Prediction Success of Machine Learning Methods for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mapping in the Tafresh Watershed, Iran

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11195426

Keywords

alternating decision tree; data mining; spatial modeling; susceptibility mapping; GIS

Funding

  1. Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience, Mineral Resources (KIGAM) - Minister of Science and ICT
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) [Q.J130000.2527.17H84]
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [19-3111-1] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Floods are some of the most destructive and catastrophic disasters worldwide. Development of management plans needs a deep understanding of the likelihood and magnitude of future flood events. The purpose of this research was to estimate flash flood susceptibility in the Tafresh watershed, Iran, using five machine learning methods, i.e., alternating decision tree (ADT), functional tree (FT), kernel logistic regression (KLR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). A geospatial database including 320 historical flood events was constructed and eight geo-environmental variables-elevation, slope, slope aspect, distance from rivers, average annual rainfall, land use, soil type, and lithology-were used as flood influencing factors. Based on a variety of performance metrics, it is revealed that the ADT method was dominant over the other methods. The FT method was ranked as the second-best method, followed by the KLR, MLP, and QDA. Given a few differences between the goodness-of-fit and prediction success of the methods, we concluded that all these five machine-learning-based models are applicable for flood susceptibility mapping in other areas to protect societies from devastating floods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available