4.6 Article

Effect of Stand Density and Soil Layer on Soil Nutrients of a 37-year-old Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantation in Naxi, Sichuan Province, China

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11195410

Keywords

Chinese fir; planting density; soil layer; understory vegetation; litter

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570619]
  2. National Scientific and Technological Task in China [2015BAD09B0101, 2016YFD0600302]
  3. special science and technology innovation in Jiangxi Province [201702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to study the characteristics of soil nutrient elements and the changes in biomass under different densities and soil layers of forest stand, this paper considers Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook) density test forests with five densities (A: 1667 treesha(-1); B: 3333 treesha(-1); C: 5000 treesha(-1); D: 6667 treesha(-1); E: 10,000 treesha(-1)) as the research objects, located in Naxi District, Sichuan Province, China. Eleven soil physical and chemical property indicators, understory vegetation, and litter biomass were measured. The results were as follows: (1) The stand density had a significant effect on the soil nutrient content, understory vegetation, and litter biomass. A low density is conducive to the accumulation of soil organic matter, hydrolytic N, available P, available K, and total Ca. (2) With the increase in soil depth, the contents of soil organic matter, total N, hydrolytic N, and total P decreased gradually; pH and total Ca decreased gradually; and available P showed a trend of decrease-up-decrease. The soil layers had no significant effect on the total K, total Fe, and total Mg concentrations. (3) Low density (density A or B) was found to be beneficial to the growth of undergrowth vegetation and forest trees, the return of nutrients, long-term soil maintenance, and the stable high yield of Chinese fir plantations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available