4.6 Article

A Methodology to Analyze the Presence of Sustainability in Engineering Curricula. Case of Study: Ten Spanish Engineering Degree Curricula

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11174553

Keywords

engineering education; sustainability in engineering degrees; sustainability competencies; engineering sustainability map; sustainability presence map; education for sustainable development; curriculum design; learning outcomes

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Gobierno de Espana [EDU2015-65574-R]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades, Gobierno de Espana [RTI2018-094982-B-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a methodology to analyze the sustainability presence level in the curriculum of an engineering degree. The methodology is applied to ten engineering degrees of the Spanish university system, taught in three different universities. The design used for the research is quantitative and correlational. The analytical instrument used is the engineering sustainability map, which contains the learning outcomes related to sustainability that are expected of engineering students upon completion of their studies. The methodology is used to analyze the curricula of the ten engineering degrees in order to identify what learning outcomes of the engineering sustainability map are developed in each degree. The results indicate that the sustainability competency least present in all the degrees is the participation in community processes that promotes sustainability, with an average presence of 23.3%, while the most present is the application of ethical principles related to the values of sustainability in personal and professional behavior,with an average presence of 76.6%. In general, learning outcomes related to sustainability have an average presence of 52.1%, so practically half of the cells in the ten engineering sustainability maps are not developed in the degrees under study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available