4.8 Article

Improved CO2 photocatalytic reduction using a novel 3-component heterojunction

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 426-433

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.060

Keywords

TiO2; 3-Component photocatalystis; Photocatalytic CO2 production; CO2 conversion; Solar energy; Artificial photosynthesis

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC, Thailand)
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578488, 2180050404]
  4. Program for Zhejiang Leading Team of ST Innovation [2013TD07]
  5. XJTLU research development fund [RDF-17-01-12]
  6. Royal Thai Government Scholarship for Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new class of three-component photocatalyst system is designed with plasmonic AuCu nanoprisms embedded between a porous single crystalline TiO2 nanoplate thin film and polyhedral zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8) nanoparticles for enhanced CO2 photocatalytic reduction. The ZIF-8 plays a role of CO2 capture to enhance the reactant concentration on the catalyst, while the AuCu nanoprisms function mainly as a mediator to improve the charge density at the interfaces and facilitate the charge transfer to the CO2 adsorption sites on ZIF-8 for subsequent CO2 reduction. The reactant CO2 could be not only readily collected on the newly designed catalyst, but also more efficiently converted to CO and CH4. As a result, compared to the reference sample of two-component system of TiO2 and ZIF-8 with a CO2 conversion rate of 12.5 mu mol h(-1) g(-1), the new three-component photocatalyst exhibited a nearly 7-fold improvement in CO2 photocatalytic reduction performance with CO2 conversion reaching an outstanding value of 86.9 mu mol h(-1) g(-1), highlighting the importance of rational heterojunction design in facilitating reactant adsorption, charge transfer and reaction processes in photocatalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available