4.5 Article

Characteristics of Ozone Pollution, Regional Distribution and Causes during 2014-2018 in Shandong Province, East China

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos10090501

Keywords

ozone; regional distribution; meteorological condition; industrial emission

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41605113]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019T120606, 2018M632713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The summer ozone pollution of Shandong province has become a severe problem in the period 2014-2018. Affected by the monsoon climate, the monthly average ozone concentrations in most areas were unimodal, with peaks in June, whereas in coastal areas the concentrations were bimodal, with the highest peak in May and the second highest peak in September. Using the empirical orthogonal function method, three main spatial distribution patterns were found. The most important pattern proved the influences of solar radiation, temperature, and industrial structure on ozone. Spatial clustering analysis of the ozone concentration showed Shandong divided into five units, including Peninsula Coastal area (PC), Lunan inland area (LN), Western Bohai area (WB), Luxi plain area (LX), and Luzhong mountain area (LZ). Influenced by air temperature and local circulation, coastal cities had lower daytime and higher nighttime ozone concentrations than inland. Correlation analysis suggested that ozone concentrations were significantly positively correlated with solar radiation. The VOCs from industries or other sources (e.g., traffic emission, petroleum processing, and chemical industries) had high positive correlations with ozone concentrations, whereas NOx emissions had significantly negatively correlation. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of ozone pollution and theoretical reference for regional management of ozone pollution in Shandong province.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available