4.5 Article

Evolution of Turbulence in the Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability in the Terrestrial Magnetopause

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos10090561

Keywords

magnetosheath; Kelvin-Helmholtz instability; turbulence; intermittency

Funding

  1. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) Short Term Mobility program 2014
  2. MCF Visiting Professor programme 2014-2015 of Universite Paris Sud

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dynamics occurring at the terrestrial magnetopause are investigated by using Geotail and THEMIS spacecraft data of magnetopause crossings during ongoing Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. Properties of plasma turbulence and intermittency are presented, with the aim of understanding the evolution of the turbulence as a result of the development of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. The data have been tested against standard diagnostics for intermittent turbulence, such as the autocorrelation function, the spectral analysis and the scale-dependent statistics of the magnetic field increments. A quasi-periodic modulation of different scaling exponents may exist along the direction of propagation of the Kelvin-Helmholtz waves along the Geocentric Solar Magnetosphere coordinate system (GSM), and it is visible as a quasi-periodic modulation of the scaling exponents we have studied. The wave period associated with such oscillation was estimated to be approximately 6.4 Earth Radii (R-E). Furthermore, the amplitude of such modulation seems to decrease as the measurements are taken further away from the Earth along the magnetopause, in particular after X (GSM) less than or similar to -15 R-E. The observed modulation seems to persist for most of the parameters considered in this analysis. This suggests that a kind of signature related to the development of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities could be present in the statistical properties of the magnetic turbulence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available