4.6 Article

Coal-Filler-Based Thermoplastic Composites as Construction Materials: A New Sustainable End-Use Application

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 19, Pages 16870-16878

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04453

Keywords

coal plastic composites; wood plastic composites; life cycle analyses; flexural strength characterization; manufacturing process models; polyethylene composites; environmental performance; composite flammability

Funding

  1. Ohio Development Services Agency under the Ohio Coal Demonstration and Pilot Program [D-18-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports investigations into coal's viability as an alternative filler to wood flour in wood plastic composites (WPCs)-a class of materials used in building applications in lieu of pressure -treated wood coal plastic composites (CPCs) were fabricated with 15-60 wt % coal combined with high-density polyethylene and their physical (mechanical, water absorption, and metal leaching) and chemical (oxidative degradation and flammability) properties were compared with commercial WPCs. In addition, mass and energy balances (10 ton/h basis) and life cycle analyses (60 wt % filler and 1 ton basis) were conducted on CPCs and WPCs to assess environmental impact during manufacturing. At 60 wt %, CPCs had higher flexural strength, slower oxidative degradation and burn rate, and lower water absorption in comparison to commercial WPCs, suggesting better performance and stability in building applications. Furthermore, CPC manufacturing showed 44% lower greenhouse gas emissions and 62% less energy usage in comparison with WPC. These results indicate that the direct utilization of coal as a filler in construction composite applications may yield lower-cost products with lower associated emissions and energy demand compared to that of existing WPC materials, potentially yielding a more sustainable end use for coal than current uses such as power production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available