4.6 Article

A kinetic model for analysis of physical tunnels in sequentially acting enzymes with direct proximity channeling

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 242-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2015.09.020

Keywords

Proximity channeling; Modelling; Diffusion-reaction; Enzymes; Kinetic parameters; Mass transfer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 21376137]
  2. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [2013Z02-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct channeling is a well-known process in which intermediates are funneled between enzyme active sites through a physical tunnel and can be a potential way to enhance the biocatalytic efficiency for cascading bioreactions. However, the exact mechanism of the substrate channeling remains unclear. In this work, we used mathematical models to describe the mass transfer in the physical tunnels and to gain further understanding of direct proximity channeling. Simulation with a diffusion-reaction model showed that the reduction of the diffusion distance of intermediates could not cause proximity channeling. A second kinetic model, which considered the physical tunnel as a small sphere capable of preventing diffusion of the intermediate into the bulk, was then constructed. It was used to show that the maximum channeling degree in branched pathways depends on the strength of the side reactions, suggesting that proximity channeling in a physical tunnel is more suitable for a pathway with strong side reactions. On the other hand, for a linear pathway, proximity channeling is more beneficial when the constituting enzymes have relatively low activities and expression levels. Our kinetic model provides a theoretical basis for engineering proximity channeling between sequentially acting enzymes in microbial cell factories and enzyme engineering. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available