4.7 Review

Biological Control of Citrus Postharvest Phytopathogens

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins11080460

Keywords

biological control; post-harvest phytopathogen; Penicillium digitatum; Penicillium italicum; Geothrichum citri-aurantii

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [FAPESP 2018/03670-0, 2016/20547-2, 2018/13027-8, 2017/24462-4]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Brasil (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Citrus are vulnerable to the postharvest decay caused by Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium italicum, and Geotrichum citri-aurantii, which are responsible for the green mold, blue mold, and sour rot post-harvest disease, respectively. The widespread economic losses in citriculture caused by these phytopathogens are minimized with the use of synthetic fungicides such as imazalil, thiabendazole, pyrimethanil, and fludioxonil, which are mainly employed as control agents and may have harmful effects on human health and environment. To date, numerous non-chemical postharvest treatments have been investigated for the control of these pathogens. Several studies demonstrated that biological control using microbial antagonists and natural products can be effective in controlling postharvest diseases in citrus, as well as the most used commercial fungicides. Therefore, microbial agents represent a considerably safer and low toxicity alternative to synthetic fungicides. In the present review, these biological control strategies as alternative to the chemical fungicides are summarized here and new challenges regarding the development of shelf-stable formulated biocontrol products are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available