4.6 Article

Microbial removal of carboxylic acids from 1,3-propanediol in glycerol anaerobic digestion effluent by PHAs-producing consortium

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 269-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2016.04.031

Keywords

Glycerol anaerobic digestion effluent; Polyhydroxyalkanoates; 1,3-Propanediol; Microbial removal; Microbial consortium

Funding

  1. Nanyang Technological University (NTU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol to 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PDO) is conceived as an economic feasible pathway to handle with increasing crude glycerol from biodiesel industry. However, glycerol anaerobic digestion effluent (ADE) consists of carboxylic acids and 1,3-PDO, imposing difficulties for separation. The objective of this study was, therefore, to investigate microbial removal of carboxylic acids from 1,3-PDO in glycerol ADE by polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) producing consortium. Growth tests on carbon sources showed Cmynebacterium hydrocarbooxydans had preference for butyrate while Bacillus megaterium for acetate and glycerol. Consequently, their consortium had a higher cell density and a faster substrate utilization rate than single strain grown in glycerol ADE. Acidic pH at 6.0 and 5.2 strongly inhibited cell growth and activity, while C:N ratio (w/w) at 8:1 could balance nitrogen demand for cell growth and PHA synthesis. Kinetic study further revealed over 80% of fed 1,3-PDO was preserved after depletion of carboxylic acids. Correspondingly, total organic carbon (TOC) contribution from 1,3-PDO rose from initial 55.8% to 84%. Produced PHAs comprised 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-HB) units. The results showed this study as the first attempt to provide a win-win solution to remove carboxylic acids from 1,3-PDO in glycerol ADE and converted them into PHAs as a secondary value-added product. (c) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available