4.3 Article

Impact of Composting Methods on Nitrogen Retention and Losses during Dairy Manure Composting

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16183324

Keywords

dairy manure; composting methods; nitrogen losses; nitrogen emissions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund Project [41601328]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470556]
  3. Public Welfare Industry (agriculture) Research Program [201503120]
  4. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research Operations of IEDA [BSRF201910]
  5. Bio-Water Saving and Dry Farming Innovation Team Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, composting is one of the most effective methods for treating fecal waste on large-scale livestock and poultry farms, but the quality effects of different composting methods are different. In this study, we implemented four composting methods, including farmer compost (FC), anaerobic compost (AnC), mixed compost (MC), and aerobic compost (AC), to study the effects of different composting methods on nitrogen (N) losses while composting dairy manure. Our results showed that the germination indexes (GIs) of three of the composting treatments (AnC, MC, and AC) exceeded 80%, which met the maturity requirements for composted products. Ammonia (NH3) emissions were the main contributor to nitrogen losses, while accumulated nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions accounted for the lowest proportion of nitrogen losses. The cumulative N losses via the leachate of the AC treatment were the lowest and accounted for 0.38% of the initial total nitrogen (TN). The accumulated N losses of the AC, FC, AnC, and MC treatments accounted for 13.13% 15.98%, 15.08%, and 19.75%, respectively, of the initial TN. Overall, the AC method significantly reduced N losses via leachates, further reducing TN losses. This observation suggests that AC might be an appropriate method for highly efficient nitrogen management during dairy manure composting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available