4.3 Article

Assessing Risk of E. coli Resuspension from Intertidal Estuarine Sediments: Implications for Water Quality

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16183255

Keywords

estuarine sediment; intertidal; cohesive sediment; sediment stability; erosion; faecal contamination; E. coli; faecal indicator organism (FIO); bathing waters; water quality

Funding

  1. University of St Andrews
  2. James Hutton Institute
  3. Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland (MASTS) - Scottish Funding Council [HR09011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estuarine sediments are a reservoir for faecal bacteria, such as E. coli, where they reside at greater concentrations and for longer periods than in the overlying water. Faecal bacteria in sediments do not usually pose significant risk to human health until resuspended into the water column, where transmission routes to humans are facilitated. The erosion resistance and corresponding E. coli loading of intertidal estuarine sediments was monitored in two Scottish estuaries to identify sediments that posed a risk of resuspending large amounts of E. coli. In addition, models were constructed in an attempt to identify sediment characteristics leading to higher erosion resistance. Sediments that exhibited low erosion resistance and a high E. coli loading occurred in the upper- and mid-reaches of the estuaries where sediments had higher organic content and smaller particle sizes, and arose predominantly during winter and autumn, with some incidences during summer. Models using sediment characteristics explained 57.2% and 35.7% of sediment shear strength and surface stability variance respectively, with organic matter content and season being important factors for both. However large proportions of the variance remained unexplained. Sediments that posed a risk of resuspending high amounts of faecal bacteria could be characterised by season and sediment type, and this should be considered in the future modelling of bathing water quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available