4.5 Article

Significance of anti-HB levels below 10 IU/L after vaccination against hepatitis B in infancy or adolescence: an update in relation to sex

Journal

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 460-464

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1656483

Keywords

Hepatitis B; vaccination; immunological memory; booster dose; protection; gender

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatitis B vaccination (three-dose series) induces long-term immunity, but it is not uncommon to find antibody levels below 10 IU/L long after vaccination. However, the majority of the subjects with low antibody levels have a prompt response to a booster dose. A population of 10,294 students at Padua University Medical School, who were subjected to hepatitis B vaccination during infancy or adolescence according to the law, was tested for the presence of anti-HBs, usually during the first year of matriculation. Among the students offered a booster dose, 1,030 were vaccinated, and the antibody titre was re-tested. The present research provides further evidence from a larger number of students (1,030) that an anti-HB level higher than 2 IU/L is predictive of a prompt response to a booster. There are also differences related to sex. The results clearly confirm that an antibody titre equal to or greater than 2 IU/L is enough to prompt a response after a booster dose, even several years after the initial vaccination cycle, and to predict effective immune protection. The length of the interval between the booster/post-booster analyses increases the probability of finding a low response to the booster; furthermore, females show a more rapid response to the booster than males. The importance for healthcare workers of measuring the antibody titre four weeks after a booster is highlighted, and the results suggest that females have a better response than males to booster vaccination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available