4.8 Article

Re-education of Tumor-Associated Macrophages by CXCR2 Blockade Drives Senescence and Tumor Inhibition in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 2156-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.068

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [261342]
  2. ERC [683136]
  3. Josef Steiner Foundation
  4. Helmut Horten Foundation
  5. Krebsliga [KFS 3505-08-2014]
  6. SNF (Ambizione) [PZ00P3_136612]
  7. AIRC [19141]
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [683136, 261342] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P3_136612] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) represent a major component of the tumor microenvironment supporting tumorigenesis. TAMs re-education has been proposed as a strategy to promote tumor inhibition. However, whether this approach may work in prostate cancer is unknown. Here we find that Pten-null prostate tumors are strongly infiltrated by TAMs expressing C-X-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CXCR2), and activation of this receptor through CXCL2 polarizes macrophages toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Notably, pharmacological blockade of CXCR2 receptor by a selective antagonist promoted the re-education of TAMs toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Strikingly, CXCR2 knockout monocytes infused in Pten(pc-/-); Trp53(pc-/-) mice differentiated in tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha)-releasing pro-inflammatory macrophages, leading to senescence and tumor inhibition. Mechanistically, PTEN-deficient tumor cells are vulnerable to TNF-alpha-induced senescence, because of an increase of TNFR1. Our results identify TAMs as targets in prostate cancer and describe a therapeutic strategy based on CXCR2 blockade to harness anti-tumorigenic potential of macrophages against this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available