4.5 Article

Anatomical Feasibility of Right Oblique Approach for L5-S1 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages E403-E408

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.135

Keywords

L5-S1; Magnetic resonance imaging; Oblique approach; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Perivascular adipose tissue

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: We compared left and right vascular anatomy at the L5-S1 disc space and validated the anatomical feasibility of the right oblique approach for L5-S1 oblique lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging studies at the L5-S1 disc level were used to study 274 subjects (164 women and 110 men; average age, 62.97 years). The distance from the center of the L5-S1 disc to the medial wall of the left or right vessel was measured. Using the vessel position, 3 groups were established: medial, middle, and lateral. To describe the morphological configuration, the vessel type and the presence of perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) around the vessels were identified on both sides. RESULTS: The vessels on the left L5-S1 disc space were located 12.47 mm from the midline and most subjects (209 subjects; 76.3%) were included in the medial or middle group. On the right side, the vessels were located more laterally (16.93 mm; P = 0.000) and most subjects (248 subjects; 90.5%) were in the middle or lateral group. On the left side, vessels were mostly veins (260 subjects; 94.9%) and 139 subjects (50.7%) had PVAT. On the right side, the vessels were mostly arteries (213 subjects; 77.7%) and 242 (88.3%) had PVAT. CONCLUSIONS: The vessels on the right side of the L5-S1 disc were located more laterally, and most vessels on the right side were arteries accompanying PVAT, which might minimize vessel manipulation. These results indicate that the right side of the L5-S1 disc could provide feasible access for oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available