Journal
JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2019.105708
Keywords
Stuttering; Pre-school; Treatment
Funding
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [570819]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
PURPOSE: To compare two experimental Westmead Program treatments with a control Lidcombe Program treatment for early stuttering. METHOD: The design was a three-arm randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessments 9 months post-randomization. Participants were 91 pre-school children. RESULTS: There was no evidence of difference in percentage syllables stuttered at 9 months among groups. Dropout rates were substantive and may have been connected with novel aspects of the trial design: the use of community clinicians, no exclusion criteria, and randomization of children younger than 3 years of age. CONCLUSION: The substantive dropout rate for all three arms in this trial means that any conclusions about the 9-month stuttering outcomes must be regarded as tentative. However, continued development of the Westmead Program is warranted, and we are currently constructing an internet version.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available