4.4 Review

Intrinsic Brain Network Biomarkers of Antidepressant Response: a Review

Journal

CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-019-1072-6

Keywords

Major depressive disorder; Biomarker; Treatment response; Predictor; Brain networks; Network connectivity

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [T32GM07739]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health
  4. Whitehall Foundation
  5. One Mind Institute
  6. KlingensteinSimons Fellowship in Brain Science
  7. Hartwell Foundation
  8. Rita Allen Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of Review Poor treatment response is a hallmark of major depressive disorder. To tackle this problem, recent neuroimaging studies have sought to characterize antidepressant response in terms of pretreatment differences in intrinsic functional brain networks. Our aim is to review recent studies that predict antidepressant response using intrinsic network connectivity. We discuss current methodological limitations and directions for future antidepressant biomarker studies. Recent Findings Functional connectivity stemming from the subgenual and rostral anterior cingulate has shown particular consistency in predicting antidepressant response. Differences in this connectivity may prove fruitful in differentiating treatment responders to many antidepressant interventions. Future biomarker studies should integrate biological MDD subtypes to address the disorder's inherent clinical heterogeneity. These clinical and scientific advancements have the potential to address this population marked by limited treatment response. Methodological considerations, including patient selection, response criteria, and model overfitting, will require future investigation to ensure that biomarkers generalize for prospective prediction of treatment response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available