4.5 Review

Epigenetics of lung cancer: a translational perspective

Journal

CELLULAR ONCOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 739-756

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13402-019-00465-9

Keywords

Lung cancer; Epigenetics; Combination therapy; Precision oncology

Funding

  1. Consejeria de Salud y Bienestar Social of Junta de Andalucia through the 'Nicolas Monardes' program [C-0040-2016]
  2. ISCIII [PI17/00033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer-related death, with a 5-year survival rate of only 18%. In recent years, the development of targeted pharmacological agents and immunotherapies has substantially increased the survival of a subset of patients. However, most patients lack such efficacious therapy and are, thus, treated with classical chemotherapy with poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. In recent years, the development of epigenetic assays and their application to cancer research have highlighted the relevance of epigenetic regulation in the initiation, development, progression and treatment of lung cancer. Conclusions Avariety of epigenetic modifications do occur at different steps of lung cancer development, some of which are key to tumor progression. The rise of cutting-edge technologies such as single cell epigenomics is, and will continue to be, crucial for uncovering epigenetic events at a single cell resolution, leading to a better understanding of the biology underlying lung cancer development and to the design of novel therapeutic options. This approach has already led to the development of strategies involving single agents or combined agents targeting epigenetic modifiers, currently in clinical trials. Here, we will discuss the epigenetics of every step of lung cancer development, as well as the translation of these findings into clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available