4.4 Article

Development trends in taxonomy, with special reference to fungi

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 406-412

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jse.12538

Keywords

fungal taxonomy; described species; species and author; output of taxonomist; quality of fungal taxonomic work

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19050201, KSZD-EW-TZ-007]
  2. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China [2096001006]
  3. Bureau of Science and Technology
  4. Biodiversity Committee of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Taxonomy is a traditional subject, but it still receives attention and has become a topic of much discussion in recent years. Many of these discussions have raised concerns about the future of taxonomy, especially with regard to the workforce responsible for the discovery of new species in the context of declining biodiversity. Previous discussions were based on the taxonomic data of plants and animals, but the status of fungal taxonomy has not been mentioned. Fungi have one of the highest levels of biodiversity among all living organisms, second only to insects. The discussion of the future of taxonomy without the inclusion of fungal data is incomplete. Here, we present the results of analyses based on all new fungal taxa published since 1753. Fungal taxonomy is an ever-growing area of study with increasing numbers of new taxa being described and growing numbers of fungal taxonomists. Compared with plants and most animal groups, there has been a much sharper increase in the rate at which new fungal taxa are being described. Furthermore, the number of taxonomists studying fungi has increased at a faster speed than those studying plants or animals. This indicates that fungal taxonomy is a prosperous subject and a dynamic area for scientific studies, and that it deserves much more attention and support. The study of fungal taxonomy will deepen our understanding of the biodiversity of our planet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available