4.7 Article

Trehalose promotes the survival of random-pattern skin flaps by TFEB mediated autophagy enhancement

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-019-1704-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81601705, 81873942, 81801930, 81572227, 81873992]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Medicine and Health Technology Project [2017KY472]
  3. Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau Foundation [2016Y0350]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Random-pattern skin flaps are commonly used and valuable tools in reconstructive surgery, however, post-operative random skin flap necrosis remains a major and common complication. Previous studies have suggested that activating autophagy, a major pathway for degradation of intracellular waste, may improve flap survival. In this study, we investigated whether trehalose, a novel and potent autophagy activator, improves random skin flap viability. Our results demonstrated that trehalose significantly improves viability, augments blood flow, and decreases tissue edema. Furthermore, we found that trehalose leads to increased angiogenesis, decreased apoptosis, and reduced oxidative stress. Using immunohistochestry and western blot, we demonstrated that trehalose augments autophagy, and that inhibition of autophagy augmentation using 3MA significantly blunted the aforementioned benefits of trehalose therapy. Mechanistically, we showed that trehalose's autophagy augmentation is mediated by activation and nuclear translocation of TFEB, which may be due to inhibition of Akt and activation of the AMPK-SKP2-CARM1 signaling pathway. Altogether, our results established that trehalose is a potent agent capable for significantly increasing random-pattern skin flap survival by augmenting autophagy and subsequently promoting angiogenesis, reducing oxidative stress, and inhibiting cell death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available