4.6 Review

Optimizing Cardiac CT Protocols for Comprehensive Acquisition Prior to Percutaneous MV and TV Repair/Replacement

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 836-850

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.041

Keywords

computed tomography angiography; transcatheter mitral valve repair/replacement; transcatheter tricuspid valve repair/replacement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical trials of transcatheter mitral valve and tricuspid valve repair and replacement devices have begun in earnest, with the ultimate goal of providing definitive, nonsurgical treatment for the millions of patients with severe, symptomatic regurgitation, many of whom are too high risk or inoperable for a surgical approach. Computed tomography (CT) angiography offers the potential for detailed anatomic assessment in this patient population, but its optimal implementation for patients with mitral and tricuspid disease requires patient-centered protocol specification reflecting the goal of the scan, an understanding of complex anatomy and pathophysiology, and particulars of CT scanner capabilities. In this paper, the need for new interventional approaches to mitral and tricuspid valve disease is discussed, followed by a detailed review of how to perform a high-quality CT angiography examination, taking into consideration scanner- and patient-specific variables when preparing a pre-mitral or tricuspid protocol. The many possible clinical challenges affecting the performance of cardiac and vascular CT angiography for pre-procedure mitral and tricuspid repair/replacement are reviewed and specific tips, trouble-shooting approaches, and recommendations are provided for how to conduct the best-quality study, be it at an experienced imaging center with the most advanced scanner or at a novice center using an earlier generation CT platform. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available