4.6 Article

AMPK activation by GSK621 inhibits human melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.040

Keywords

Melanoma; AMPK; GSK621; MEK-ERK; Apoptosis

Funding

  1. Guangzhou medical and health science and technology [20141A011072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies suggest that forced activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) could inhibit melanoma cell proliferation. In this report, we evaluated the anti-melanoma cell activity by a novel small-molecular AMPK activator, GSK621. Treatment of GSK621 decreased survival and proliferation of human melanoma cells (A375, WM-115 and SK-Mel-2 lines), which was accompanied by activation of caspase-3/-9 and apoptosis. Reversely, caspase inhibitors attenuated GSK621-induced cytotoxicity against melanoma cells. Significantly, GSK621 was more potent than other AMPK activators (A769662, Compound 13 and AICAR) in inhibiting melanoma cells. Intriguingly, same GSK621 treatment was non-cytotoxic or pro-apoptotic against human melanocytes. Molecularly, we showed that activation of AMPK mediated GSK621's activity against melanoma cells. AMPK alpha 1 shRNA knockdown or dominant negative mutation (T172A) dramatically attenuated GSK621-induced melanoma cell lethality. Further studies revealed that MEK-ERK activation might be the primary resistance factor of GSK621. MEK-ERK inhibition, either genetically or pharmacologically, significantly sensitized melanoma cells to GSK-621. Remarkably, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of GSK621 inhibited A375 tumor growth in SCID mice. Co-administration of MEK-ERK inhibitor MEK162 further sensitized GSK621-induced anti-A375 tumor activity in vivo. Together, the results imply that targeted activation of AMPK by GSK621 inhibits melanoma cell survival and proliferation. MEK-ERK inhibition may further sensitize GSK621's anti-melanoma cell activity in vitro and in vivo. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available