4.6 Article

Proton pump inhibitor use increases mortality and hepatic decompensation in liver cirrhosis

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 33, Pages 4933-4944

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4933

Keywords

Proton pump inhibitor; Liver cirrhosis; Mortality; Hospitalisation; Complications; Portal hypertension; Variceal bleeding; Ascites; Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; Hepatic encephalopathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed, often without dear indications. There are conflicting data on its association with mortality risk and hepatic decompensation in cirrhotic patients. Furthermore, PPI users and PPI exposure in some studies have been poorly defined with many confounding factors. AIM To examine if PPI use increases mortality and hepatic decompensation and the impact of cumulative PPI dose exposure. METHODS Data from patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis were extracted from a hospital database between 2013 to 2017. PPI users were defined as cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) >= 28 within a landmark period, after hospitalisation for hepatic decompensation. Cox regression analysis for comparison was done after propensity score adjustment. Further risk of hepatic decompensation was analysed by Poisson regression. RESULTS Among 295 decompensated cirrhosis patients, 238 were PPI users and 57 were non-users. PPI users had higher mortality compared to non-users [adjusted HR = 2.10, (1.20-3.67); P = 0.009]. Longer PPI use with cDDD > 90 was associated with higher mortality, compared to non-users [aHR = 2.27, (1.10-5.14); P = 0.038]. PPI users had a higher incidence of hospitalization for hepatic decompensation [aRR =1.61, (1.30-2.11); P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION PPI use in decompensated cirrhosis is associated with increased risk of mortality and hepatic decompensation. Longer PPI exposure with cDDD > 90 increases the risk of mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available