4.4 Article

High-throughput screening of active compounds against human respiratory syncytial virus

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 535, Issue -, Pages 171-178

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.07.002

Keywords

Human respiratory syncytial virus; High-throughput screening; RSV inhibitor; Azathioprine; 6-Mercaptopurine

Categories

Funding

  1. National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for AIDS and Viral Hepatitis and Other Major Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period [2013ZX10004601]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [81771777]
  3. National Mega -Project for Infectious Disease [2018ZX10301408]
  4. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [2018-I2M-3-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the predominant pathogens causing lower respiratory tract infection in infants and young children worldwide, whereas there is so far no vaccine or drug against RSV infection for clinical use. In this work, we developed and validated a fluorescence-based high-throughput screening (HTS) assay to identify compounds active against RSV, using RSV-mGFP, a recombinant RSV encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). Thereafter, among 54,800 compounds used for our screen, we obtained 62 compounds active against RSV. Among these hits, azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) were identified as RSV inhibitors with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 6.69 +/- 1.41 and 3.13 +/- 0.98 mu M respectively. Further experiments revealed that they functioned by targeting virus transcription or/and genome replication. In conclusion, the established HTS assay is suitable to screen anti-RSV compounds, and the screened two hits of AZA and 6-MP, as potential anti-RSV agents targeting RSV genome replication/transcription, are worthy of further investigation on their anti-RSV activity in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available