4.7 Article

Geotechnical site investigation for tunneling and underground works by advanced passive surface wave survey

Journal

TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 319-329

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.05.003

Keywords

Crosscorrelation; Site investigation; Rayleigh/Love wave; Passive surface wave; Bedrock depth; Shear wave velocity

Funding

  1. Land Transport Authority Singapore (LTA) [R-302-000-164-490]
  2. Petroleum Engineering Professorship (EDB)
  3. Ministry of Education of Singapore Tier-1 Grant [R-302-000-165-133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces crosscorrelation seismic interferometry, a new and feasible complimentary surface wave survey for geotechnical site investigation for tunneling and underground works. Crosscorrelation seismic interferometry uses ambient noise as source to estimate the green's functions received by geophones. The proposed methodology is presented and demonstrated by three case studies in Singapore. The 1st case study demonstrates the workflow of the proposed method. Conventional active multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) and passive microtremor array measurement (MAM) have also been carried out on the same site. The comparison with classic active MASW shows that the dispersion curves and shear wave velocity profiles derived by crosscorrelation are more comparable and reasonable. With multiple signal classification (MUSIC) beamforming, the direction of arrival (DOA) of ambient noise field can be characterized. As the prerequisite of crosscorrelation method, with the known DOA, it also affords the opportunity to measure both Rayleigh and Love waves. The 2nd case study demonstrates that the polarization of shear wave velocities can be distinguished by the proposed method. The 3rd case study shows a feasible way to construct a 2D shear wave velocity profile. In short, with a simple linear array, fewer geophones, crosscorrelation is considered to be an attractive complement to the conventional MAM and MASW survey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available