4.7 Article

Dynamic response of sandwich panel with hierarchical honeycomb cores subject to blast loading

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 499-515

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.029

Keywords

Sandwich panel; Hierarchical structure; Blast resistance; Energy absorption; Impulse loadings; Explosion-proof structure

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621004]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  3. ARC Discovery [DP190103752]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575172, 11602161]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [201601D021025]
  6. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body [31615008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a novel hierarchical core structure to sandwich panel for bearing the blast loading, in which each vertex of a regular hexagonal cell was replaced with a smaller hexagonal unit. The finite element (FE) models of such hierarchical honeycomb sandwich panels were established and validated with the experiments under different impulse loads. The hierarchical honeycomb cores were compared with the regular honeycomb counterpart in terms of the peak deflection on the back facesheet, compression and specific energy absorption (SEA) of the core. The results showed that the maximum deflection at the back facesheet of the hierarchical honeycomb sandwich panels were smaller than the regular honeycomb counterpart for a higher level of blast load (specifically, the dimensionless impulse higher than 0.06). It was found that the structural hierarchical parameter gamma (i.e. the ratio of the newly-introduced smaller hexagonal edge length (L-1) to the regular hexagon edge length (L-0)), had limited influence on the maximum deflection of back facesheet of the sandwich panel, but had a significant effect on the SEA of the cores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available