4.6 Article

High temperature oxidation and erosion of candidate materials for particle receivers of concentrated solar power tower systems

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages 883-889

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.057

Keywords

Concentrating solar; Particle receiver; High temperature erosion; High temperature oxidation

Categories

Funding

  1. Technology Marketing of the German Aerospace Center
  2. DLR Energy Programme Directorate [LRV 16/113]
  3. Helmholtz Validation Fund (HVF) of the Helmholtz Association [HVF-0028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The centrifugal particle receiver is a novel concept proposed for concentrated solar power plants (CSP) to increase their operating temperature and efficiency. In this concept solar radiation is directly absorbed by a layer of ceramic particles held at the inner surface of a rotating cylindrical receiver by the centrifugal force. During operation, the hot ceramic particles (up to 1000 degrees C) move slowly along the receiver wall as well as other system components (e.g. tubes), which leads to their degradation through high-temperature oxidation and erosion. In the present study, a series of high temperature erosion-oxidation exposures was undertaken to experimentally evaluate performance of selected candidate metallic materials for centrifugal particle receivers. The exposures were conducted in a laboratory test facility consisting of a resistance heated furnace filled with ceramic particles, in which the specimen holder was rotated. Typical high temperature materials, such as martensitic, ferritic and austenitic stainless steels, Ni-base and Co-base alloys were investigated. The specimens were discontinuously exposed at 400-750 degrees C for up to 500 h and further characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy/wavelength dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX/WDX).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available