4.7 Article

Interaction of nitrogen and shading on tomato yield and quality

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages 255-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.040

Keywords

Abiotic stress; Metabolites; Nutritional quality; Mineral nutrition; Nitrate; Thermal screen

Categories

Funding

  1. INIA [RTA2010-00119-00-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the use of shade cloths is an economic and common practice to mitigate the effect of high temperatures in greenhouse crops in warm areas, the decrease of solar radiation may alter some physiological processes of the plant, modifying their nutritional needs and ultimately affecting production and quality. In this paper we study the effect of nitrogen dose and its interaction with the use of shade cloths on the quality of tomatoes, with particular attention paid to their bioactive compound content. The treatments consisted of three levels of N (14, 7 and 3 mM), combined with two levels of light intensity, control (100% light), and shading (60% light) provided by shade cloth. Shading adversely affected the production of tomatoes cultivated with 14 mM N, although a lower dose of N offset the negative effect of shade on performance. Shading did not affect the concentration of sugars in the fruit, but decreased the phenolic compound and vitamin C contents. By contrast, a decrease in the dose of N increased the concentration of phenolic compounds at 100% light and that of vitamin C with and without shading. Shading decreased the concentration of beta-carotene only in the case of plants grown with the highest concentration of N. The concentration of lycopene, contrary to that observed for all other metabolites of interest, increased with shading. Under these shading conditions, the decrease in the dose of N did not affect the beta-carotene and lycopene concentrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available