4.7 Article

Anaerobic biological fermentation of urine as a strategy to enhance the performance of a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC)

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 936-943

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.120

Keywords

Raw human urine; Fermented human urine; Microbial electrolysis cell; Anaerobic digestion; Two-stage bioconversion process; H-1 NMR

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UID/BIO/04469, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684]
  2. BioTecNorte operation - European Regional Development Fund [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004]
  3. European Union's Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration [308535]
  4. Wetsus, European Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effect of pre-fermented urine on anode performance of a two-chambered microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) compared to raw urine. Pre-fermentation of urine was performed by anaerobic digestion. The effect of this pre-fermentation on anode performance of a MEC was assessed by measuring the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), current density and Coulombic efficiency (CE). The MEC using fermented urine achieved a higher average current density (218 +/- 6 mA m(-2)) and a higher CE (17%). Although no significant differences were observed in the COD removal efficiency between both urines, the MEC using fermented urine displayed the highest COD removal rate (0.14 +/- 0.02 g L-1 d(-1)). The organic compounds initially found in both urines, as well as the metabolic products associated to the biodegradation of the organic matter were analyzed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 NMR). The main compounds initially identified in the raw urine were urea, creatinine and acetate. In the fermented urine, the main compounds identified were methylamine, acetate and propionic acid demonstrating the effectiveness of the anaerobic fermentation step. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available